Invested a lot of the cost of purchasing the luxury of software, but only use a limited number of functions, which is user systems management software in the choice of a mistake.
Today's IT systems have full access to a wide range of application times. In order to continually to internal staff and external customers to provide services, IT systems are ever increasing relationship with the customer more directly, more closely. In this case, there is no system management software, or do not have a good system management software, providing a high dependence on IT services and business enterprises, is hard to imagine, and their service level or quality is very difficult to guarantee. For IT personnel who is IT systems management software makes the maintenance and management from passive to active and take preventive measures. However, because of system management software in the enterprise IT systems play an important role in maintenance, so how to choose it to be a cautious approach was needed to do.
Recent visit to the systems management software provider NetIQ Hans Brouwer, vice president of international business interview to remind the Chinese user, system management software selection to be careful, "Tantaiqiuquan." He said the current system management software no more than two categories: the characteristics of a class of large and hope to meet the needs of all users; another have focused on some specific needs, want a choice, to grasp living system, the core elements of management. The former with HP, IBM, CA, BMC as the representatives, representatives of the latter is the NetIQ.
He said that the large and many users tend to choose systems management software, easily several million dollars invested. Not only has this phenomenon of foreign and domestic, too. In fact may not necessarily be so. On the one hand, this may result in large one-time investment, implementation complexity, high cost, the project risks. More importantly, the vast majority of cases, the user can really use up a few features on it, most of the features may not ever use, is obvious waste. If the user when the product selection, consider lightweight system management software, and perhaps would be better.
He suggested that users choose the software, it is best able to determine the application focus, and then to determine the basis of this requirement can best meet the needs and implement the most simple software. For example, NetIQ's systems management software to give users AppMananger is a surprise to. It has a lean and flexible structure, not only take up system resources when running low, and because it provides a convenient secondary development platform that helps users save cost, truly do more with less work.
As NetIQ's agent, Beijing financial sea Hanson Consulting Co., Ltd. Chairman and CEO Zhao Pingjie told reporters in the past year from the AppManager application in the Chinese market situation, the user of the AppManager are approval to enter China this year is the first year , had sales of 500 million yuan, also am very pleased with them.
According to Zhao Pingjie introduction, AppManager's features focus on usability, it is the choice and implementation of the core part, and very easy to implement. As long as the core caught, even if not solve the problem 100 percent, but it can solve 90% of the problem. AppManager has a very strong advantage, mainly in:
The first interface is very friendly and very simple to use. Because it was developed and lost a lot of the burden of the old system, is the new design. The structure of the whole system is very simple, compact and flexible, making them very easy to use software and implementation.
Second, the effect of very good use, take up less resources, the system will monitor how many systems have some performance impact. Typically, an older system, resource-management software is about 5% to 30%, which is very high. So often, many customers have not the time to install the system management software, hold the high expectations, after installed, only to find a serious impact on the core business operation of the system. At home and abroad, many such examples. AppManager in this regard is very capable, very stable when running. Architecture because it has a choice, to ensure focus on open systems.
Hans Brouwer said, "because the focus can be done well, it might be more concise."